|
Deutsche Welle vom 7.10.2004
Klicken Sie bitte <hier>
um das Original zu betrachten.
Bringing the
Brains Back Home
The GAIN network, an initiative
started to help lure German researchers home, is celebrating its
first anniversary. A number of similar programs have sprung up,
but are they working?
Thousands of German scientists and academics are currently
working abroad, many of them in the United States. The lopsided
flow of Germany's "best and brightest" to academic institutions
overseas has sent off alarm signals and prompted several new
initiatives to lure them back.
The New York-based German Academic International Network (GAIN)
is one such project. A joint effort of the German Academic
Exchange Service (DAAD), the German Research Council (DFG) and
the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (AvH), the network is
celebrating its one year anniversary this week. Another similar
project, the German Scholars Organization (GSO), headquartered
in San Francisco, also recently passed the one year mark.
In a handy division of labor, GAIN has focused on distributing
information and creating a forum for German scientists working
abroad, while the GSO has taken a more practical approach and
started an online job bank to match candidates with openings.
Both have been complemented by new individual initiatives --
fellowships, grants -- offered by Germany's top research and
funding organizations.
But a year into the start of the all-out offensive to counter
brain drain with brain gain, the jury's still out on whether
such efforts are proving effective. Meanwhile, a recently
published study conducted by the German Research Council (DFG)
has questioned the extent of the crisis.
Extent of crisis hard to pinpoint
The DFG study, published in May of this year, found that 85
percent of scientists who leave Germany eventually return home.
However the study only looked at a very specific group, those
who received post-doctoral fellowships from the DFG. Still, the
figures contradicted previous, largely anecdotal estimates that
have painted a more dire picture.
According to the alarmists, the brain drain phenomenon is not
unique to Germany but a Europe-wide problem. For example, in
November of 2003, the European Commission reported that 75
percent of EU citizens who obtained a doctorate in the United
States had no plans to return to Europe. In Germany, a study
conducted by the German Science Foundation came out somewhere in
the middle, finding that 43 percent of German scientists abroad
had no intention of returning home, while 44 percent for
undecided or willing.
Indeed, the extend of the crisis has remained hard to dispute.
But if the DFG study is correct, and those 15 percent who remain
abroad are the best in their field, that could still represent a
significant loss for Germany, Beate Scholz a DFG spokeswoman,
told DW-WORLD.
"The numbers might not be that large, but we could have a
problem in terms of quality," she said.
Scholz pointed to yet another study commissioned by the German
Federal Ministry for Science and Research that found those who
remained abroad were among the most highly qualified in their
field.
Rigid system with uncertain prospects
Steffen Berg, a physicist at Princeton University who researches
surface active agents, is one of the German researchers
currently living in the US who would like to return. But he also
understands the frustrations of those who aren't so eager to
follow his lead.
"Germany is pretty good at educating people to a certain level,
but then it gets difficult because there are limited options,"
he told DW-WORLD.
Berg has heard numerous complaints from his colleagues. Some
focus on the antiquated so-called "habilitation" system in
Germany, which requires post-doctoral researchers to work with
tenured professors for several years and complete another thesis
before they can become professors themselves. Others cite young
researchers' lack of independence.
Old boy's network a problem
Some, according to Berg, are also put off by the insider "old
boys network" of the German scientific community, where jobs do
not always go to the most highly qualified candidates, but those
with the best connections.
"In Germany, sometimes your chance of getting a good professor
position has less to do with the quality of your work and more
to do with your contacts," Berg said.
Despite such misgivings, Berg would still like to return home,
and he credits projects such as the GAIN initiative and new
fellowship opportunities with luring him back.
New programs change attitudes
In recent years, German research institutions have taken steps
to make the prospect of pursuing a career in Germany more
appealing to young researchers, and for many that has meant
ushering in a host of new programs to provide those scientists
with the much-wished-for independence.
The Emmy Noether program, administrated by the German Research
Foundation, is one such initiative, and the Young Investigators
Award, offered by the Helmholtz Association, is another. Both
give young researchers enough funding to establish their own
labs and pursue independent work for up to four and five years
respectively.
Berg, who is applying for the Noether fellowship program, said
the prospect of working independently has certainly been an
incentive. But he and other young scientists abroad may not have
known about the new opportunities if it wasn't for the efforts
of GAIN, he said, and in that case he gives credit where credit
is due.
Everybody just wants to be loved
But at the end of the day, it's just nice to feel needed, Berg
said, adding that GAIN has certainly helped to better inform him
and other young scientists about new opportunities. But it has
also made him feel sought after.
"It's nice to feel like my return is appreciated," he said.
At a recent event held at MIT in Boston, the directors of some
of Germany's most prestigious research institutions were on hand
to underline that point, Katja Simons the project manager for
GAIN, told DW-WORLD.
"They were sending a very important signal to these young
scientists: You are important to us," she said.
Kristine Ziwica
|